Streamlining management at schoolSecurity & your dataEverything it doesBlog
EduBoldBook a demo

Build your timetable05 / 11

Three weeks of your best teacher’s life, every year.

Somebody senior disappears into a room in May with a grid, a list of teachers and a pot of tea. They come out in June with a timetable that mostly works, and a Thursday afternoon that does not. The school then lives with that Thursday for a year.

The problem today

One person understands it, and clashes are found by teachers.

  • The timetable is built by hand, by one person, who becomes the only person who understands it.
  • Clashes are found by teachers, in the first week, in front of a class.
  • A teacher’s preference is honoured only if they keep asking for it.
  • Nobody knows who is overloaded until somebody complains in October.
  • A teacher is absent and covering the day means finding whoever is free, by asking.
  • Changing anything in September means touching the whole grid again.
An empty classroom with rows of desks and afternoon light through the window

What EduBold changes

You set the constraints. It places the lessons.

Build your timetable/What goes in

  • Constraints
  • Schedule pattern
  • Rooms and facilities
  • Subject load per class
  • Teacher preferences

Timetable viewer Class 10-A

Total periods: 37
Generated class timetable for Class 10-A. Blank cells are periods the generator reported it could not place.
PeriodTimeMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
108:00–08:45ChemistryGurpreet KaurScience LabBiologyAnita RaoScience LabPhysicsVikram JoshiRoom 12EnglishPrabhjot KaurRoom 12HistoryRitu MalhotraRoom 12GeographyRohit BansalRoom 12
208:45–09:30MathematicsRohit BansalRoom 12HistoryRitu MalhotraRoom 12HindiPrabhjot KaurRoom 12ChemistryGurpreet KaurScience LabPhysicsVikram JoshiRoom 12Computer ScienceAnita RaoComputer Lab
309:30–10:15BiologyAnita RaoScience LabMathematicsRohit BansalRoom 12GeographyRohit BansalRoom 12PhysicsVikram JoshiRoom 12EnglishPrabhjot KaurRoom 12BiologyAnita RaoScience Lab
410:15–11:00HistoryRitu MalhotraRoom 12PhysicsVikram JoshiRoom 12EnglishPrabhjot KaurRoom 12BiologyAnita RaoScience LabChemistryGurpreet KaurScience LabEnglishPrabhjot KaurRoom 12
511:00–11:45GeographyRohit BansalRoom 12HindiPrabhjot KaurRoom 12+++MathematicsRohit BansalRoom 12
611:45–12:30PhysicsVikram JoshiRoom 12ChemistryGurpreet KaurScience LabBiologyAnita RaoScience Lab+++
713:15–14:00EnglishPrabhjot KaurRoom 12EnglishPrabhjot KaurRoom 12ChemistryGurpreet KaurScience LabComputer ScienceAnita RaoComputer LabMathematicsRohit BansalRoom 12+
Fig. 01A generated week for one class, with the periods it placed and the total it was asked to place. Demonstration data.

The system places the week

You give it the constraints, the schedule pattern, the rooms, the subject load per class and each teacher’s preferences. It places the lessons.

The scheduler works greedily where it can and backtracks where it must, inside a time budget you set. When the budget runs out it stops searching and places the rest greedily, so it always returns a timetable rather than hanging.

Then it tells you the truth about what it produced: an optimisation score, how many lesson units it tried to place, and how many it actually managed. If it genuinely cannot run, because there are no teaching slots or no demand, it says so rather than handing you an empty grid.

It finds its own clashes, and proposes the fix

Conflict detection runs across the timetable and scores what it finds, so you are looking at a ranked list rather than one long pile.

For each conflict it generates resolution suggestions, each with alternatives to choose between. Apply one, or let it auto-resolve. Accept a clash deliberately and mark it ignored, and it stops appearing.

Teacher preferences are an input, not a complaint

Preferences go in before generation and form part of the solve. Afterwards, you can calculate a satisfaction score per teacher and see how well their preferences were actually met.

Copy one teacher’s preferences to another when somebody new joins on similar terms.

You can try a version without losing the one that works

Timetables version. Generate a new one, compare it, and roll back to a snapshot if it is worse.

Changes go through approve, apply and rollback, so a mid-year adjustment is a governed action rather than an edit somebody made without telling anyone.

Cover is a workflow

Substitution handles an absent teacher without touching the rest of the week.

You can see the load before term starts

Workload summaries per teacher, calculated for the whole staff at once. Room capacity, facilities and utilisation reports, so you know whether the estate is actually being used or whether one lab is doing all the work.

Rooms can be blocked for scheduled maintenance, and the timetable knows the lab is unavailable for those two weeks rather than finding out on the day.

For the honest reader: this is a constraint solver, not artificial intelligence. It is classical computer science, done properly, and that is a better claim than the fashionable one.

The detail that decides it

EduBold tells you whether one day is far harder than the rest.

There is a function that analyses schedule balance and another that analyses break distribution.

Every school has a class whose Monday is four hard subjects in a row and whose Friday afternoon is games, library and a free period. Everybody knows it happens. Almost nobody can see it, because seeing it means reading every teacher’s grid at once and comparing them.

The system reads them. It can also optimise the break distribution rather than just reporting on it.

This is the sort of thing that never appears on a feature list and changes how a school actually feels to be in.

For the management committee

One of the largest hidden costs in the school.

Timetabling is usually invisible to the committee: two to three weeks of a senior teacher’s time every year, repeated in every branch.

There is also a governance angle. Teacher workload summaries make staffing load visible and comparable across branches, which is the evidence a committee needs when a department asks for another appointment.

Next

Bring your hardest question.

Half an hour, on the problems your school actually has. Bring the thing your current system cannot do, and you will watch EduBold run it against your own rules before you decide anything.